수집원문

Lead Content of Consumer Products tested in King County, Washington

Public Health – Seattle & King County and the Hazardous Waste Management Program are providing data describing the lead content of consumer products.

영문 원문 보기
Lead Content of Consumer Products tested in King County, Washington

Public Health – Seattle & King County and the Hazardous Waste Management Program are providing data describing the lead content of consumer products. This data is collected from several sources, including community product testing events, in-home investigations of lead-poisoned children, and products purchased for testing for research projects. Data are presented using two types of testing methods: product screening using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis and laboratory analysis . Because XRF screening can be conducted without destroying the object to be tested, this method was used to test products that could not be submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Examples of the types of products tested via XRF analysis include keys, jewelry, cookware, dishware, toys, and other essential or valuable items. However, it is important to note that XRF analysis is only a screening method that gives approximate results and may have high detection limits for some products. Although XRF analysis is very useful for identifying products that could contain relatively high lead levels, it cannot be used to compare lead results to regulatory limits or standards. Laboratory analysis is the “gold standard” for product testing. Laboratory analysis can theoretically achieve detection limits for lead in the part per billion (ppb) range, although the detection limits can be higher if not enough sample is provided for analysis and/or the sample is chemically very complex (causing “matrix interference”). Examples of the types of products tested via laboratory analysis include seasonings, cosmetics, candy, dietary supplements, and other items that can be destroyed for analysis. Laboratory results can be used to compare lead concentrations to regulatory limits or standards. Laboratory methods used to analyze consumer products for lead content include graphite furnace atomic absorption (GFAA), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Technical notes: Regardless of the method used, the lead concentrations are provided in parts per million (ppm). One part per million is equivalent to 0.0001 percent. One percent is 10,000 ppm. See the Lead Limits for Consumer Products table below for how we compared the lead concentrations in the tested products to acceptable limits. Every testing method has limitations in the smallest amount of lead that can be detected in a product. For the XRF analyzer, the instrument’s limit of detection (or LOD) varies depending on the sample’s chemical composition, shininess, curvature, positioning, and operator factors. For laboratory analysis, the relevant detection limit – the limit of quantitation (or LOQ) - can also vary, depending on the chemical complexity of the sample, the amount of sample collected, how the sample is prepared, and how it is analyzed. Therefore, where results are presented with the &quot<&quot (less than) symbol, it means the lead concentration is some number less than the reported value (i.e., the LOD or LOQ). It is not possible to compare results presented as below the LOQ or LOD to lead limits. For some research projects, the median XRF result may also be represented with a qualifier if more than 50% of the measurements were below the LOD. For research projects, the XRF value presented is the median of all measurements taken on the product. For all other data sources, the XRF value presented is the maximum of all measurements taken. Disclaimer: Staff collect information as it appears on product labels or as reported to staff during community events and investigations. Factors such as language barriers and terminology variations may result in misspelling and mislabeling of some products. The amount of lead found in a consumer product can also vary greatly because of variation

번역은 이해를 돕기 위한 미검수 초벌 또는 구조화 안내입니다. 계약·의료·법률 판단에는 원문을 확인하세요.
연결된 문서
전역 집계 전현재 별표는 이 브라우저에만 저장
카탈로그 수집2026. 7. 28.출처 연결됨

아직 수집하지 않음실측 품질 · 가격 · 인증 · 지역 · 공식 여부 · 수명주기무엇을 확인하고 무엇을 남겨 두는지

SELECTION SUMMARY

도입 판단 요약

Public Health – Seattle & King County and the Hazardous Waste Management Program are providing data describing the lead content of consumer products. This data is collected from several sources, including community product testing events, in-home investigations of lead-poisoned children, and products purchased for testing for research projects. Data are presented using two types of testing methods: product screening using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis and laboratory analysis . Because XRF screening can be conducted without destroying the object to be tested, this method was used to test products that could not be submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Examples of the types of products tested via XRF analysis include keys, jewelry, cookware, dishware, toys, and other essential or valuable items. However, it is important to note that XRF analysis is only a screening method that gives approximate results and may have high detection limits for some products. Although XRF analysis is very useful for identifying products that could contain relatively high lead levels, it cannot be used to compare lead results to regulatory limits or standards. Laboratory analysis is the “gold standard” for product testing. Laboratory analysis can theoretically achieve detection limits for lead in the part per billion (ppb) range, although the detection limits can be higher if not enough sample is provided for analysis and/or the sample is chemically very complex (causing “matrix interference”). Examples of the types of products tested via laboratory analysis include seasonings, cosmetics, candy, dietary supplements, and other items that can be destroyed for analysis. Laboratory results can be used to compare lead concentrations to regulatory limits or standards. Laboratory methods used to analyze consumer products for lead content include graphite furnace atomic absorption (GFAA), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Technical notes: Regardless of the method used, the lead concentrations are provided in parts per million (ppm). One part per million is equivalent to 0.0001 percent. One percent is 10,000 ppm. See the Lead Limits for Consumer Products table below for how we compared the lead concentrations in the tested products to acceptable limits. Every testing method has limitations in the smallest amount of lead that can be detected in a product. For the XRF analyzer, the instrument’s limit of detection (or LOD) varies depending on the sample’s chemical composition, shininess, curvature, positioning, and operator factors. For laboratory analysis, the relevant detection limit – the limit of quantitation (or LOQ) - can also vary, depending on the chemical complexity of the sample, the amount of sample collected, how the sample is prepared, and how it is analyzed. Therefore, where results are presented with the &quot<&quot (less than) symbol, it means the lead concentration is some number less than the reported value (i.e., the LOD or LOQ). It is not possible to compare results presented as below the LOQ or LOD to lead limits. For some research projects, the median XRF result may also be represented with a qualifier if more than 50% of the measurements were below the LOD. For research projects, the XRF value presented is the median of all measurements taken on the product. For all other data sources, the XRF value presented is the maximum of all measurements taken. Disclaimer: Staff collect information as it appears on product labels or as reported to staff during community events and investigations. Factors such as language barriers and terminology variations may result in misspelling and mislabeling of some products. The amount of lead found in a consumer product can also vary greatly because of variation

이 제품의 적합 용도와 제한 조건은 아직 검수하지 않았습니다. 태그와 카테고리는 찾아가는 길이지 적합성 보증이 아닙니다.

EVIDENCED ADVANTAGES

API 특·장점

공급자·카탈로그·실측·편집 근거가 있는 신호만 표시하며, 근거 유형을 함께 밝힙니다.

카탈로그출처가 확인된 제품

카탈로그 원본과 확인 시점이 연결되어 있습니다.

CATALOG TRUST

색인0

재배포 정책과 기본 식별 조건을 통과해 검색할 수 있지만 편집 승인은 아직 완료되지 않았습니다.

평가 2026. 07. 28. 13:05

같은 목적의 대체 API

같은 카테고리에서 공개 상태와 품질 근거를 우선해 표시합니다.

ARCHIVED - Childhood DisordersCounty of San Diego

This dataset is no longer updated as of April 2023.

경기도_목욕장업(찜질시설서비스영업) 현황경기도

이 데이터는 경기도의 찜질시설 서비스 영업장을 포함한 목욕장업 현황을 기록한 자료로, 인허가 및 영업 상태 관리와 공중위생 정책 수립에 활용됩니다. 목욕장업(찜질시설 서비스 영업)은 목욕을 할 수 있는 시설 및 설비 등의 서비스 또는 맥반석·황토·옥 등에 직접, 간접적으로 가열하여 발생되는 열기 또는 원적외선 등을 이용하여 땀을 낼 수 있는 시설 및 설비 등의 서비스를 제공하는 업체(소) 중 찜질시설서비스 등에 해당되는 업체(소)입니다. 이를 이용하여 다중이용업소 여부와 영업상태 정보를 활용하여 안전관리, 위생 관리 및 지역 상권 분석에 적용할 수 있습니다.

식품의약품안전처 식품의약품안전평가원_식품의약품안전처 연구관리 연도별 시행계획 조회 서비스식품의약품안전처 식품의약품안전평가원

[공통설명]식약처 데이터는 의약품,식품,의료기기,화장품 등 다양한 품목에 관한 허가 및 심사 정보, 제조와 유통 이력,안전성 평가,부작용 사례,위해 정보 등을 포괄적으로 포함하고 있으며, 이러한 데이터를 기반으로 정책 수립, 연구개발,산업 현장 지원 등에 필수적인 기초 자료로 폭넓게 활용되어 국민 건강과 안전을 효과적으로 보호하는 데 매우 중요한 역할을 성실히 수행하고 있습니다. 또한,최신 동향과 기술 변화를 반영하여 데이터의 신뢰성과 정확성을 지속적으로 개선하고, 다양한 기관 및 전문가와의 협력을 통해 국민에게 보다 안전한 환경을 제공하는 데 기여하고 있습니다.[데이터설명]연도별 시행계획 정보를 조회한다.

Food Establishment Inspection DataPublic Health - Seattle & King County

Health Department inspection results for food service establishments in King County, 2021 to the present.

경기도_휴게음식점(철도역구내) 현황경기도

이 데이터는 경기도 내 철도역 구내에서 운영되는 휴게음식점에 대한 현황 자료로, 31개 시군의 인허가 정보를 기반으로 수록되어 있습니다. 주요 항목으로는 시군명, 사업장명, 인허가일자, 영업상태, 폐업일자, 소재지 주소 및 면적, 위생업종 및 업태, 총시설규모, 종사자 수(남녀별), 다중이용업소 여부, 위치정보(WGS84 좌표계) 등이 포함되어 있습니다. 본 데이터는 철도역 이용자의 편의성과 위생 안전을 고려한 식음료 서비스 관리, 유동인구 기반 입지 분석, 관광객 대상 서비스 평가, 공공편의시설 확충 등에 활용할 수 있으며, XML 또는 JSON 포맷의 Open API로 제공됩니다.

Lung and Bronchus Cancer 2005-2009 per Zip CodeNY State Dept. of Health

The ZIP Code lists show the number of people who developed the specific type of cancer while living in the ZIP Code area between 2005 and 2009.